Re: Galileo's Paradox

On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 07:32:58 -0500, Bob Kolker <nowhere@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Eckard Blumschein wrote:



I consider Dedekind wrong, and he admitted to have no evidence in order
to justify his basic idea.

What sort of evidence? Surely not empirical evidence. Mathematics done
abstractly has no empirical content whatsoever.

Except apparently for axioms and definitions.

~v~~
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Its not ALL pseudo-science
    ... All the empirical evidence points in that direction. ... exact chemical processes from millions of years ago which are ... efficacy or lack thereof of prayer? ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: All Evidence is Subjective...
    ... empirical evidence and the need to put forth endless rationalizations ... to hide this lack of evidence. ... presented to me and the rest of civilization for creation, ... ignoring all of the relative evidence for God. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Rolf allows us to realize that there is far more observational
    ... Supposedly the evidence of biological ... system and creature arose meaningless? ... No empirical evidence is ever "unambiguous", ... origin of biological novelty and its development to maturity. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: How to mock evolution and generally have a good time
    ... Now I will continue to mock evolution, since I get so much amusement ... human history that has "empirical evidence for" God (as opposed to a ... Sorry but the kind of empirical evidence for G_D that you are asking ... you must think that all scientists are rejecting ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Atheist Philosophy
    ... In the field of religion as far as I am aware no one has ever been able ... to produce any empirical evidence to support the existence of their god> ... not a child, and who is not very dim, is unaware of the empirical evidence ...
    (uk.philosophy.atheism)