Re: Galileo's Paradox
- From: Tony Orlow <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:36:24 -0500
Eckard Blumschein wrote:
On 11/29/2006 3:58 PM, Tony Orlow wrote:where one set contains all the elements of another, plus more, it can rightfully be considered a larger set.
All of oo?
Yes. All of the naturals are integers. Only half of all the integers are naturals.
All of the points in (0,1] are in (0,2], but only half of all of the points in (0,2] are in (0,1].
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
- From: Eckard Blumschein
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
- References:
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
- From: Virgil
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
- From: Bob Kolker
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
- From: Eckard Blumschein
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Next by Date: Re: Number of abelian groups + exact sequence
- Previous by thread: Re: Galileo's Paradox
- Next by thread: Re: Galileo's Paradox
- Index(es):