Re: Galileo's Paradox
- From: Eckard Blumschein <blumschein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 19:00:01 +0100
On 11/29/2006 3:58 PM, Tony Orlow wrote:
where one set contains all the
elements of another, plus more, it can rightfully be considered a larger
set.
All of oo?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
- References:
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
- From: Virgil
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
- From: Bob Kolker
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
- Prev by Date: Re: How to explain this to someone (highschooler)?
- Next by Date: Gap: conversion from int to char
- Previous by thread: Re: Galileo's Paradox
- Next by thread: Re: Galileo's Paradox
- Index(es):
