Re: Is it possible for a probability to be unknown?
- From: "Jonathan Hoyle" <jonhoyle@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Nov 2006 08:11:39 -0800
Math1723 wrote:
Non-repeatable scenarios, or repeatable ones whose parameters we are
not privy to, make it difficult to construct a mathematical model so as
to estimate such probabilities.
How about a scenario like this:
Ask two people to each think of a number. What is the probability that
they are thinking of the same number?
(Note that I intentionally did not give a range to choose from.)
That is at least a repeatable experiment. It does not matter whether
or not you gave them a range. You can continually run the experiment,
by selecting two new people for each trial, and calculate the hit
percentage.
Even without a range, most people will think of an integer, and the
vast majority will choose a single digit one at that. One might guess
that the hit rate would thus be around 10%, perhaps less for the few
who go outside that range. But certain numbers are more likely to be
favored over others: 3, 5 and 7 are (I would guess) more likely to be
picked than, say, 1, 2 or 9.
I would guess a hit rate closer to 20-25%, but that is pure speculation
on my part.
Jonathan Hoyle
.
- References:
- Is it possible for a probability to be unknown?
- From: tjb
- Re: Is it possible for a probability to be unknown?
- From: Jonathan Hoyle
- Re: Is it possible for a probability to be unknown?
- From: Math1723
- Is it possible for a probability to be unknown?
- Prev by Date: Re: standard terminology regarding sequences? (help!)
- Next by Date: Re: How to explain this to someone (highschooler)?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is it possible for a probability to be unknown?
- Next by thread: Re: Is it possible for a probability to be unknown?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|