Re: Cantor Confusion

Eckard Blumschein wrote:

sinde and generally uncountable just fictitious reals on the other side.

In other words: Genuine numbers are countable, fictitious numbers are
uncountable. The latter do not have an available numerical address.

For the latest time: countability is a property of sets, not individual numbers.

There is no such thing as a countable integer, countable rational or countable real.

Bob Kolker

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Galileos Paradox
    ... Eckard Blumschein wrote: ... Rationals are p/q. ... All numbers are equally genuine in any meaning of "genuine" other than ... EB's improper meaning of "irrational". ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?
    ... Eckard Blumschein wrote: ... Bob Kolker is really too dense as to understand my intention. ... Do you refer to a person named Hoover as to a Hoover which or a Hoover who? ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Galileos Paradox
    ... Eckard Blumschein wrote: ... Rationals are p/q. ... All numbers are equally genuine in any meaning of "genuine" other than ... EB's improper meaning of "irrational". ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Countability of real numbers
    ... Eckard Blumschein wrote: ... Real originally means the opposite of ... the reals are likewise different from genuine ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?
    ... Eckard Blumschein wrote: ... Cauchy sequences do the job if they include actually infinitely much of ... Bob Kolker is really too dense as to understand my intention. ... He was commenting on your deplorable grammar, ...
    (sci.math)