Re: Cantor Confusion

On 12/5/2006 2:45 PM, *** T. Winter wrote:

> I wonder why the mathematicians believe to require one-point
> compactification. I consider the rationals as genuine numbers, being as
> close as you like to the fictions infinity and real numbers. The exact
> numerical representation of pi requires the fiction of actual infinity.

I wonder why you are talking about things you know nothing about? Who
requires one-point compactification with what goal?

When I presented ideas in connection with
http://iesk.et.uni-magdeburg.de/~blumsche/M283.html
I faced scepticism or refusal as well as the hint to compactification.

I consider my ideas still flawless. I even found plausible answers to
several questions no mathematician was able to provide a convincing
answer to. So I doubt about fundamentals which require compactification.

.

Quantcast