Re: Galileo's Paradox

From: "Tonico" <Tonicopm@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 5 Dec 2006 13:00:41 -0800

Eckard Blumschein ha escrito:

On 12/5/2006 4:46 PM, Tonico wrote:

Eckard Blumschein ha escrito:

On 12/4/2006 11:52 PM, Virgil wrote:

I am an electrical engineer

Shocking!

Why? We love mathematics.

***************************************************
Oh, I bet elec. eng. love maths; the problem seems to be that maths
does not correspond AT ALL that love, at least in the case of several
engineers...**sigh**...tough.
Tonio

What is maths?

*******************************************
I knew it!! Didn't I tell you all?
Tonio

.

References:
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
  - From: Eckard Blumschein
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
  - From: Bob Kolker
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
  - From: Eckard Blumschein
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
  - From: Virgil
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
  - From: Eckard Blumschein
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
  - From: Virgil
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
  - From: Eckard Blumschein
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
  - From: Virgil
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
  - From: Eckard Blumschein
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
  - From: Tonico
- Re: Galileo's Paradox
  - From: Eckard Blumschein

Prev by Date: Re: Cantor Confusion
Next by Date: Re: Infinite simple groups and their proper subgroups
Previous by thread: Re: Galileo's Paradox
Next by thread: Re: Galileo's Paradox
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Galileos Paradox
... We love mathematics. ... Oh, I bet elec. ... eng. love maths; the problem seems to be that maths ...
(sci.math)
Re: Galileos Paradox
... Oh, I bet elec. ... eng. love maths; the problem seems to be that maths ... does not correspond AT ALL that love, at least in the case of several ...
(sci.math)
Re: Galileos Paradox
... Oh, I bet elec. ... eng. love maths; the problem seems to be that maths ... does not correspond AT ALL that love, at least in the case of several ...
(sci.math)
Re: Galileos Paradox
... We love mathematics. ... Oh, I bet elec. ... eng. love maths; the problem seems to be that maths ...
(sci.math)