Re: 0^0: "Solving a 1200-year-old problem"
- From: impartially_insane@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 6 Dec 2006 22:22:57 -0800
Black.Wyvern.11@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
His first two rules are true.
However, I deduced this from a reciprocal triangle.
.....1...
------------
..0...|....Infinity
But nullity? This is rubbish.
0//0 is 1 or Infinity, depending on how you analyze the problem.
0/0 can take on any value you want. Consider lim x->0 ax/x for any real
a.
A.
His pseudomaths is rubbish. Someone shun this man immediately!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 0^0: "Solving a 1200-year-old problem"
- From: impartially_insane
- Re: 0^0: "Solving a 1200-year-old problem"
- References:
- 0^0: "Solving a 1200-year-old problem"
- From: matt271829-news
- Re: 0^0: "Solving a 1200-year-old problem"
- From: Jonathan Hoyle
- Re: 0^0: "Solving a 1200-year-old problem"
- From: Black . Wyvern . 11
- 0^0: "Solving a 1200-year-old problem"
- Prev by Date: Re: Continuity of spacetime
- Next by Date: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Previous by thread: Re: 0^0: "Solving a 1200-year-old problem"
- Next by thread: Re: 0^0: "Solving a 1200-year-old problem"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|