Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Lester Zick <dontbother@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 11:18:29 -0700
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 06:48:40 -0500, Bob Kolker <nowhere@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Those who pretend to be able of knowing every integer and, therefore,
to imagine the whole actually infinite set.
If there were an integer I could not imagine, there would have to be a
least such integer. Well, it isn't 0 or 1. So the least integer I could
not image has a predecessor. But I can imagine it. I could also imagine
adding one to it.
Contradiction.
Also sprach philosopher Bob.
~v~~
.
- References:
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Eckard Blumschein
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Bob Kolker
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Franziska Neugebauer
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Franziska Neugebauer
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Bob Kolker
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Next by Date: Re: Infinity......
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Index(es):