Re: Cantor Confusion

From: Eckard Blumschein <blumschein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 19:53:59 +0100

On 12/7/2006 8:14 AM, David Marcus wrote:

Eckard Blumschein wrote:

Nevertheless, all these arguments of mine are most likely flawless.

Wow! That has got to be your most absurd statement yet!

Weak statements invite for refutation.

Good luck

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantor Confusion
  - From: Virgil

References:
- Re: Cantor Confusion
  - From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
  - From: William Hughes
- Re: Cantor Confusion
  - From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
  - From: William Hughes
- Re: Cantor Confusion
  - From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
  - From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor Confusion
  - From: Eckard Blumschein
- Re: Cantor Confusion
  - From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor Confusion
  - From: Eckard Blumschein
- Re: Cantor Confusion
  - From: Bob Kolker
- Re: Cantor Confusion
  - From: Eckard Blumschein
- Re: Cantor Confusion
  - From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor Confusion
  - From: Eckard Blumschein
- Re: Cantor Confusion
  - From: David Marcus

Prev by Date: Re: Cantor Confusion
Next by Date: Re: Galileo's Paradox
Previous by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
Next by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread