Re: JSH: One mystery remains
- From: gjedwards@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 9 Dec 2006 11:39:32 -0800
jstevh@xxxxxxx wrote:
I want to know why any of you would think that I am wrong at this
point.
This is very important.
Why would any of you given what has happened from the publication in
the math journal, to my having this neat prime counting function find,
to a very simple explanation with a second proof that removes any
mathematical doubt about my research, think I'm wrong?
Or if you don't think any of that is true, why not?
Why do you think people argue with me all the time when it's usually
the same people replying to similar arguments over a period of
literally years?
How do you explain all of that thinking I am wrong?
What do you think is actually going on here?
Your answers are very important.
I need to know how you are thinking here.
James Harris
Because I go with the math, and the refutations of your 'results' are
correct. Pretty sure that's the same with most posters, so there's no
big mystery. Remember, nobody disagreed that your prime counting
formula was correct. Everything else is wrong. Simple as that. Get over
yourself.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains
- From: jstevh
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains
- References:
- JSH: One mystery remains
- From: jstevh
- JSH: One mystery remains
- Prev by Date: Re: alt.math.recreational, alt.math, sci.math
- Next by Date: Re: JSH: One mystery remains
- Previous by thread: Re: One mystery remains
- Next by thread: Re: JSH: One mystery remains
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
