Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: David Marcus <DavidMarcus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 14:03:48 -0500
Bob Kolker wrote:
David Marcus wrote:
Nonsense. If you use a word, you must define it. Please define
"countable number".
Not every word can be (verbally) defined. This would lead to
circularity. Some words can only be defined by ostention or example.
Or, by giving axioms that the word satisfies. However, something must be
given or we are only discussing poetry.
--
David Marcus
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Bob Kolker
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- References:
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Eckard Blumschein
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Eckard Blumschein
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Bob Kolker
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Ralf Bader
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Eckard Blumschein
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Eckard Blumschein
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Bob Kolker
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- Prev by Date: JSH: One mystery remains
- Next by Date: Re: Solid angle
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|