Re: One mystery remains
- From: "Karenia Brevis" <spamless@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 13:13:11 -0600
<jstevh@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1165691024.908865.211970@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I want to know why any of you would think that I am wrong at this
point.
This is very important.
Why would any of you given what has happened from the publication in
the math journal,
*nothing of yours was ever published, your one paper was withdrawn.*
to my having this neat prime counting function find,
to a very simple explanation with a second proof that removes any
mathematical doubt about my research, think I'm wrong?
*you have not shown anything right*
Or if you don't think any of that is true, why not?
Why do you think people argue with me all the time when it's usually
the same people replying to similar arguments over a period of
literally years?
*because you still have errors in every Math posting*
How do you explain all of that thinking I am wrong?
*you have not presented any correct proofs yet*
What do you think is actually going on here?
*you are to arrogant to admit you are wrong => u r crackpot *
Your answers are very important.
I need to know how you are thinking here.
no, you don't,
go buy a set of Math books and read them,
*trolling here, you learn nothing*.
James Harris
.
- References:
- JSH: One mystery remains
- From: jstevh
- JSH: One mystery remains
- Prev by Date: Re: JSH: Short explanation, why error is so big
- Next by Date: Re: Galileo's Paradox
- Previous by thread: JSH: One mystery remains
- Next by thread: Re: JSH: One mystery remains
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
