Re: Galileo's Paradox

Tony Orlow wrote:
There is nothing wrong with saying E and N have the same cardinality.
It's a fact. Six Letters is essentially suggesting IFR, my Inverse
Function Rule, which indeed can parametrically compare sets mapped onto
the real line, using real valued functions, as a generalization to set
density. It works for finite and infinite sets. So, what is wrong with
trying to form a more cohesive theory of infinite set size, which
distinguishes set sizes that cardinality cannot? There certainly seems
to be intuitive impetus for such a theory.

Fine. Please state your rule. Let's take a look.

--
David Marcus
.

Quantcast