JSH: One mystery remains

I want to know why any of you would think that I am wrong at this
point.

This is very important.

Why would any of you given what has happened from the publication in
the math journal, to my having this neat prime counting function find,
to a very simple explanation with a second proof that removes any
mathematical doubt about my research, think I'm wrong?

Or if you don't think any of that is true, why not?

Why do you think people argue with me all the time when it's usually
the same people replying to similar arguments over a period of
literally years?

How do you explain all of that thinking I am wrong?

What do you think is actually going on here?

Your answers are very important.

I need to know how you are thinking here.


James Harris

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: JSH: One mystery remains
    ... Why would any of you given what has happened from the publication in ... to a very simple explanation with a second proof that removes any ... Why do you think people argue with me all the time when it's usually ... the same people replying to similar arguments over a period of ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Express What, not How.
    ... i also read the post he purported to be replying to. ... > I'm rather baffled that anybody would argue against this, ... that last paragraph, but against the rhetoric in the preceeding text. ... > it is perfectly natural to use anonymous functions in exression, ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: Express What, not How.
    ... i also read the post he purported to be replying to. ... > I'm rather baffled that anybody would argue against this, ... that last paragraph, but against the rhetoric in the preceeding text. ... > it is perfectly natural to use anonymous functions in exression, ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Rome and the US
    ... your explanation is no explanation at all. ... That is your opinion, ... that I love to argue, which must be apparent to you. ... "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom: ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: anonymous initializer problem
    ... Absolutely - can't argue with that. ... violent agreement there. ... Jon Skeet - ... If replying to the group, please do not mail me too ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)