Re: JSH: One mystery remains


jstevh@xxxxxxx wrote:
I want to know why any of you would think that I am wrong at this
point.

This is very important.

Why would any of you given what has happened from the publication in
the math journal, to my having this neat prime counting function find,
to a very simple explanation with a second proof that removes any
mathematical doubt about my research, think I'm wrong?

Or if you don't think any of that is true, why not?

I sincerely believe that your "non-poynomial factorization"
arguments are nonsense. (I have given many
reasons for thinking this).

I think that the publication in a math journal was an
obvious editorial error (it was clear looking just
a stylistic points that the paper had never been
reviewed).

I think that the reason that the journal shut down is
because it was so poorly run that no one was willing to
continue funding it.

I think that your algorithm for evaluting the prime counting
function, while correct, is of very limited interest,
and in particular does not lead to any insight
into the Riemann Hypothesis.

I think that currently you are trying to
create a "contradiction" by defining the function
g'(x) twice.

Now. I have a question for you. Over the previous
ten years you have almost always claimed that your
proof of FLT was correct and simple. However,
over that time the proof changed many, many times.
You currently claim that you have a proof of FLT
and that is is correct and simple. Why do you
think this claim has any credibility at all?
(i.e. Why should someone who is not willing
or capable of reading your proof attach any
weight whatsoever to your claim?)

- William Hughes

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Book 6 Paperback: Offer to Draco Fixed
    ... then decided to pull words out of the book for some reason... ... She decided to remove the words before publication. ... publisher. ... perfectly adequate reasons why she made the choice she did. ...
    (alt.fan.harry-potter)
  • Re: JSH: One mystery remains
    ... Pretty sure that's the same with most posters, ... nobody disagreed that your prime counting ... the publication in the math journal, and still keep trusting when the ... they defend to protect their group and group feeling. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: One mystery remains
    ... Pretty sure that's the same with most posters, ... nobody disagreed that your prime counting ... the publication in the math journal, and still keep trusting when the ... they defend to protect their group and group feeling. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: One mystery remains
    ... Why would any of you given what has happened from the publication in ... Why do you think people argue with me all the time when it's usually ... the same people replying to similar arguments over a period of ... nobody disagreed that your prime counting ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: One mystery remains
    ... Why would any of you given what has happened from the publication in ... Why do you think people argue with me all the time when it's usually ... the same people replying to similar arguments over a period of ... nobody disagreed that your prime counting ...
    (sci.math)
Loading