Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- From: "Andrew Usher" <k_over_hbarc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 9 Dec 2006 21:32:38 -0800
Why are there so many on this groups whose mathematical goal is to
disprove uncountability? I can't imagine, really, why it would be a
crank target.
The idea it not at all counterintutive (like relativity and quantum
mechanics are usually); in fact, if you can understand it at all, I
don't see how you could doubt it. Yet there are those whose intution,
apparently, is strange enouh to compass the portposition that the reals
are equinumerous with the counting numbers.
Beside's it's just a dead end - you'd think they'd want something more
interesting to work on ...
Andrew Usher
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- From: Albrecht
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- From: Six Letters
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- From: marcus_b
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- From: Bob Kolker
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- From: Keith Ramsay
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- From: José Carlos Santos
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- From: Larry Hammick
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- From: Tonico
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Next by Date: Re: Maths and programming languages.
- Previous by thread: JSH: The right thing to do now, a vote
- Next by thread: Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading