Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- From: Tony Orlow <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 12:41:54 -0500
Bob Kolker wrote:
Andrew Usher wrote:
Why are there so many on this groups whose mathematical goal is to
disprove uncountability? I can't imagine, really, why it would be a
crank target.
Cantor was (and is) a target for cranks and others because his name was not von Richthoffen or some such. No self respecting von Richthoffen would have called his first transfinite cardinal by the name "aleph".
Bob Kolker
Thanks for the anti-semitism, there, Bob. Now, back to your goose-stepping workout.
Tony Orlow
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- From: Virgil
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- From: Bob Kolker
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- References:
- Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- From: Andrew Usher
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- From: Bob Kolker
- Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- Prev by Date: Integral version of recursive form of "sums of powers"
- Next by Date: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Previous by thread: Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- Next by thread: Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|