Re: JSH: Two proofs equals a lot of denial
- From: "Rupert" <rupertmccallum@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 10 Dec 2006 19:53:54 -0800
Jesse F. Hughes wrote:
"Tim Peters" <tim.one@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Tell you what, though. If he agrees to your proposal, and his
prime-counting paper is published by the Annals, I'll give him a cashier's
check for US $10,000.00.
Great. Thanks to you, the editor will likely make a deal with JSH and
agree to publish it for an 80-20 cut.
If I were an editor at the Annals, I would need a lot more than $8000
to publish James' paper.
--
"Eventually the truth will come out, and you know what I'll do then?
Probably go to the beach. I'll also hang out in some bars. Yup, I'll
definitely hang out in some bars, preferably near a beach."
-- JSH on the rewards of winning a mathematical revolution
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: JSH: Two proofs equals a lot of denial
- From: Tim Peters
- Re: JSH: Two proofs equals a lot of denial
- Prev by Date: Re: Opinions on mathematics.
- Next by Date: Re: JSH: Two proofs equals a lot of denial
- Previous by thread: Re: JSH: Two proofs equals a lot of denial
- Next by thread: Re: JSH: Two proofs equals a lot of denial
- Index(es):