Re: Opinions on mathematics.
- From: Gauster <godelian@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:38:28 EST
In article
<jack-0A4BC5.16490010122006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
om>,
Michael Press <jack@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Folks have talked about the how mathematics isIt is
practiced and the nature of mathematical objects.
difficult to address these matters without sayingunderstood.
'mathematical objects' and expecting to be
It looks like we are stuck with the notion ofis
mathematical objects.
From time to time someone tells me that mathematics
not science. I disagree with this assertion. Thereason
is that a mathematical object is a structure thatwe
construct in our mind with the aid of writings and
diagrams. When doing mathematics we are mapping our
minds, and changing our minds. This is my outlookin a
nutshell. Mathematics is a science. Our minds arereal.
Unicorns are a construction of our minds. By your
logic, are unicorns
real?
Sure. At least they can be seen as real as a mathematical object or even as a table. After all we don't have any other hint of the existence of the table than its perception through our senses. Unicorns and math objects are also perceptions and thus not substantially different from a table. The difference is only qualitative.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Opinions on mathematics.
- From: Bob Kolker
- Re: Opinions on mathematics.
- References:
- Re: Opinions on mathematics.
- From: fishfry
- Re: Opinions on mathematics.
- Prev by Date: Re: Opinions on mathematics.
- Next by Date: Re: Opinions on mathematics.
- Previous by thread: Re: Opinions on mathematics.
- Next by thread: Re: Opinions on mathematics.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading