Re: JSH: One mystery remains


T.H. Ray wrote:
I want to know why any of you would think that I am wrong at this
point.

Because mainly, you have provided no context in which
one could even possibly think that you are right.

Hasn't he brought up the "object ring" recently? That's the context,
where all of his results are actually true. Problem is, the "object
ring" is not unique, and the algebraic integers also satisfy the
criteria for being an "object ring".

He's also talked about an imaginary (?) world called Contrary, where
aliens define sqrt(4) to be -2, and all his results are true in that
context as well.

--- Christopher Heckman

One does not just "throw out some ideas" and "play
around with some concepts" and come up with what is,
to a mathematician, a recognizable proof.

Proof has form and meaning. You have to supply that,
not your reader.

Maybe you don't have meaning at all levels, but certainly at the top.

Forget the calculational examples. Even aside from the
fact that many of them are clearly wrong, they have
no meaning outside of theorem and theory.

Mr. Harris, it really is not all that difficult to
learn proof methods. Yes, it is hard to execute them,
and hard to know which to apply to the problem at hand.
If your object is to convince anyone that you know what
you are doing, however, you must challenge yourself to
learn the language.

You've just been added to his "list of people to be crushed by The
Hammer".

--- Christopher Heckman

This is very important.

Why would any of you given what has happened from the
publication in
the math journal, to my having this neat prime
counting function find,
to a very simple explanation with a second proof that
removes any
mathematical doubt about my research, think I'm
wrong?

Or if you don't think any of that is true, why not?

Why do you think people argue with me all the time
when it's usually
the same people replying to similar arguments over a
period of
literally years?

How do you explain all of that thinking I am wrong?

What do you think is actually going on here?

Your answers are very important.

I need to know how you are thinking here.


James Harris


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: JSH: One mystery remains
    ... you have provided no context in which ... to a mathematician, a recognizable proof. ... Proof has form and meaning. ... Yes, it is hard to execute them, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: One mystery remains
    ... Hasn't he brought up the "object ring" recently? ... That's the context, ... --- Christopher Heckman ... Proof has form and meaning. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: "crew" and "butch"
    ... and if the context in which the two ... all while retaining each previous meaning or nuance. ... I'm not aware of "papoose" having more than one meaning, ... A "ring" on a hob, is virtually unknown in North America. ...
    (alt.usage.english)
  • Re: On the Militia of the US Constitution
    ... Specifically, the meaning of ... of territory occupied by the political societies within ... Thus the meaning of "the people" in the context of the ... Justice Story just showed you that the context determines the ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: Of win64 and pets
    ... >> A multiplicity of contexts does not mean a multiplicity of meanings within ... do take the concept of a single unified meaning for granted. ... it remains relatively pointless to argue that each context ... The state of unknowability would be a case where there is "fundamental ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)