Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- From: Six Letters
- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:11:32 +0000
On 11 Dec 2006 17:30:45 GMT, Bart Goddard <goddardbe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Six Letters wrote:
Just because 99.999......................% of so-called cranks are
just cranks doesn't mean they all are.
Wouldn't that be equal to 100%? <sfsf>
Bart
Christ! Not much sense of humour round here is there.
Six Letters
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- From: Bart Goddard
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- References:
- Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- From: Andrew Usher
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- From: Six Letters
- Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- From: Bart Goddard
- Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- Prev by Date: Re: Galileo's Paradox
- Next by Date: Re: Opinions on mathematics.
- Previous by thread: Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- Next by thread: Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
