Re: JSH: One mystery remains


jstevh@xxxxxxx wrote:
I want to know why any of you would think that I am wrong at this
point.

This is very important.

Why would any of you given what has happened from the publication in
the math journal, to my having this neat prime counting function find,
to a very simple explanation with a second proof that removes any
mathematical doubt about my research, think I'm wrong?

what

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Help with Ray’s paper
    ... Since the evidence is massive, yes, I have admitted this before. ... like to suggest a typical format for a technical publication, ... why you thought a new explanation was needed ... Over the years you have made it clear that your objection to evolution ...
    (talk.origins)
  • =?windows-1252?Q?Re=3A_Help_with_Ray=92s_paper?=
    ... Since the evidence is massive, yes, I have admitted this before. ... like to suggest a typical format for a technical publication, ... why you thought a new explanation was needed ... Over the years you have made it clear that your objection to evolution ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Help with Ray’s paper
    ... Since the evidence is massive, yes, I have admitted this before. ... like to suggest a typical format for a technical publication, ... why you thought a new explanation was needed ... Over the years you have made it clear that your objection to evolution ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Help with Rays paper
    ... like to suggest a typical format for a technical publication, ... why you thought a new explanation was needed ... If you have legitimate objections that the evidence is not ... If incredulity of evolution is all you have, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Help with Ray’s paper
    ... like to suggest a typical format for a technical publication, ... why you thought a new explanation was needed ... legitimate objections that the evidence is not supported by the ... then any philosophical objections you have are ...
    (talk.origins)