Re: JSH: One mystery remains
- From: richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard Tobin)
- Date: 12 Dec 2006 02:28:19 GMT
In article <1165889030.181648.62060@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<jstevh@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Publication in a peer reviewed math journal meant absolutely NOTHING to
sci.math'ers.
Absolutely right. Peer review is a means, not an end. If peer review
fails to spot bogus papers, they're still bogus. That your paper was
accepted shows that the journal's reviewing was inadequate.
-- Richard
--
"Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters
in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains
- From: jstevh
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains
- References:
- JSH: One mystery remains
- From: jstevh
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains
- From: T.H. Ray
- Re: JSH: One mystery remains
- From: jstevh
- JSH: One mystery remains
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantor's cardinality finally refuted.
- Next by Date: Re: Hadamard product(schur product)
- Previous by thread: Re: JSH: One mystery remains
- Next by thread: Re: JSH: One mystery remains
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
