Re: JSH: One mystery remains


Richard Tobin wrote:
In article <1165889030.181648.62060@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<jstevh@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Publication in a peer reviewed math journal meant absolutely NOTHING to
sci.math'ers.

Absolutely right. Peer review is a means, not an end. If peer review
fails to spot bogus papers, they're still bogus. That your paper was
accepted shows that the journal's reviewing was inadequate.

-- Richard

Well either this newsgroup will get down on its knees and beg for
forgiveness for destroying that journal or sci.math will cease to
exist.

Some of you Usenetters forget that you get to post for free because a
lot of other people are paying the bills.

Seems to me that sci.math is giving a lot of reason to re-think the
current system.

Gotcha.

You people just don't think far enough ahead.

Part of the endgame is not only the end of sci.math but changing all of
Usenet.

Free is not always good.


James Harris

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: JSH: One mystery remains
    ... Peer review is a means, ... fails to spot bogus papers, ... forgiveness for destroying that journal or sci.math will cease to ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: One mystery remains
    ... Peer review is a means, ... fails to spot bogus papers, ... like we all get ice cream? ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: One mystery remains
    ... Peer review is a means, ... fails to spot bogus papers, ... So I assume JSH is paying for his access? ... JSH pays so that he can post his garbage. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: One mystery remains
    ... Peer review is a means, ... fails to spot bogus papers, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: One mystery remains
    ... Peer review is a means, ... fails to spot bogus papers, ... in some alphabets" - X3.4, ...
    (sci.math)