Re: Galileo's Paradox

In article <457EACA0.60506@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Eckard Blumschein <blumschein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 12/11/2006 9:40 PM, Virgil wrote:

How does EB think he can deduce that N = oo?

I did not claim deducing N = oo.


Then let us eliminate all "genuine" reals, which according to EB are
individually uncountable objects and restrict ourselves to what EB calls
putative reals, the Dedekind cuts, each of which is, as a set, countable
with cardinality 2.

You did not understand anything.

That I do not kowtow to nonsense does not limit my understanding of
things that make good sense.
.

Quantcast