Re: Opinions on mathematics.
- From: "T.H. Ray" <thray123@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 04:10:01 EST
In article <4u5pcsF16pa00U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Bob Kolker <nowhere@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Michael Press wrote:object. I
The notion of unicorns are not a mathematical
matham very surprised to discover the notion in a
almost as fantastical asforum.
Alright. How about a one sided surface. That is
a unicorn or a fire-breathing dragon. Or a bottlewith no inside or
outside.abstraction
I think that mathematical objects are mind
constructions developed from observation,
andfrom observation, mappings of mental processes,
newstriving for explication that leads to forming
observation?mental paths.
How does anyone get a calbari-yao manifold from
How did anyone get it without observation? Not that I
know the definition of a cym, but manifolds are
abstractions from geometric surfaces such as spheres
and quadric surfaces.
The only mathematics we can do is what our
spatio-temporal apparatus allows, unless we receive
signals from another plane that gives us new
mathematics. When we do mathematics we are mapping
and
explicating that apparatus. Not that that is all we
are
doing.
--
Michael Press
Certainly, a Calabi-Yau manifold is not a product of
our "spatio temporal apparatus," nor can it be described
in terms of such an apparatus.
Tom
.
- References:
- Re: Opinions on mathematics.
- From: Michael Press
- Re: Opinions on mathematics.
- Prev by Date: Re: Why "monotonically" increasing?
- Next by Date: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Previous by thread: Re: Opinions on mathematics.
- Next by thread: Re: Opinions on mathematics.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|