Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: "zuhair" <zaljohar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 14 Dec 2006 14:18:44 -0800
MoeBlee wrote:
zuhair wrote:
ExAy yex<->P(y). is y here free or bounded?
Which 'y'? There are two of them, plus any finite number of them in
P(y).
And do you mean:
ExAy yex<->P(y)
or do you mean:
ExAy(yex <-> P(y)).
Then figure out for yourself what is free and bound.
MoeBlee
The only objection I Have to this is that I saw many in this forum
write both of these to mean the same thing. Perhaps I got it wrong.
Anyhow I am developing a new line of thinking about my small set
theory.
here is a trial.
-Small Set Theory-
Primitive e
Definition:
Ax(x is P_embeded <-> (Ay: y e x <-> P(y)) /\ P(x))
1)Extensionality: As in ZFC
2)Comprehesnion: ExAy ( yex <-> (P(y) /\ ~( x is P_embeded)) )
3)Infinity: As in ZFC.
Of course all theorums that I have wrote before should be corrected
after the correction of 2).
This theory has a universe, all its sets are well founded and the set
of all ordinals is a set
In other manner it escapes all known paradoxes.
Smiles
Zuhair
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: zuhair
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- References:
- ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: zuhair
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: hagman
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: zuhair
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: hagman
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: zuhair
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: hagman
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: zuhair
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: zuhair
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: zuhair
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: zuhair
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: zuhair
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: MoeBlee
- ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- Prev by Date: Re: Integer Triangle
- Next by Date: Re: Calculus Book Recommendations
- Previous by thread: Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- Next by thread: Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|