Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: "Jonathan Hoyle" <jonhoyle@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 14 Dec 2006 14:43:12 -0800
Bob Kolker wrote:
Virgil wrote:
And it is plain that no sound mathematics can be developed unless based
on some axiom system as its solid foundation.
Arithmetic was around long before it was axiomatized and people were
proving theorems about integers. For example Gauss and Euler.
Bob Kolker
True, but you are ignoring Virgi's adjective "sound". Calculus existed
way back during the time of Newton and Leibniz, but you could hardly
call their use of the infinite and infinitessimals at all "sound" by
today's standards. It wasn't until Bolzano and Weierstrass made things
truly rigorous in the 19th century was Calculus anywhere near sound.
It is in fact their essential treatments that we are taught Real
Analysis today, not Newton's. (Newton's work would be barely
recognizable today with its "fluxions" and "fluents".)
Bolzano and Weierstrass gave way to more rigor in numbers by Cantor,
and then rigor in Set Theory by Zermelo and Fraenkel. Then with the
wonderful contributions of Hilbert, Lebesgue, Godel, and others,
mathemaatics today is far more rigorous than it was over a century ago.
Even infinitessimals were consistently defined by Robinson. With the
exception of Aristotle's Logic and Euclid's Geometry, much of
mathematics would not be considered acceptable by today's standards.
Even Guass and Euler played a bit fast and loose (although they were
considered impeccably precise in their day.)
In ancient times, arithmetic was discovered in much the same way
physical laws were. "Hey, notice that when we do this, that always
happens..." As centuries of very hard work, mathematicians have boiled
arithmetic assumptions down to some basic axioms, and all of the
remaining theorems flow forth.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Bob Kolker
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- References:
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Bob Kolker
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Bob Kolker
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Bob Kolker
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- Prev by Date: Re: it is my homework help me
- Next by Date: Re: About the Extended Euclidean Algorithm
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading