Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: "MoeBlee" <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 Dec 2006 12:37:30 -0800
Jesse F. Hughes wrote:
Then why two?
Ay((yex v y=x) <-> P[y])
Yep, I shoulda thunk it.
MoeBlee
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: zuhair
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- References:
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: zuhair
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: zuhair
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: zuhair
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: zuhair
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: zuhair
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: zuhair
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: zuhair
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- Prev by Date: Re: A misapplication of probability theory in exam grading
- Next by Date: Re: Placing Balls in Urns and Expected values
- Previous by thread: Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- Next by thread: Re: ZFC in 4 Axioms.
- Index(es):
