Re: Seventeen months.
- From: fernando revilla <frej0002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2006 11:21:51 EST
Nick wrote:
You might have put something more informative in the
title eg the subject of
the paper.
Unless you wished to tantalise;)
Nick
That is a very good idea, thank you very much.
Fernando.
.
- References:
- Re: Seventeen months.
- From: Nick
- Re: Seventeen months.
- Prev by Date: Re: PI random? Debate running in circles (you try making math jokes)
- Next by Date: Re: Why does Cantor a target for cranks?
- Previous by thread: Re: Seventeen months.
- Next by thread: Re: Seventeen months.
- Index(es):
Loading
