Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Franziska Neugebauer <Franziska-Neugebauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 22:06:14 +0100
mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
William Hughes schrieb:[...]
Assume that there exists an L_D which contains all the numbers
contained in the diagonal. L_D is bounded,
If an unbounded diagonal exists, then obviously an unbounded line must
exist.
The conclusion is false, so the antecedent cannot be true.
Non sequitur:
Logical Implication
p q p -> q
F F T *1)
F T T
T F F *2)
T T T
*2) is the interpretation I would prefer. I may help you:
If the moon exists today then obviously Germany must be
a monarchy today.
Following the Mückenheim-reasoning one would "conclude" that the moon
does not exist. The point is that you erroneously think by simply
juxtaposing p, "->" and q you "prove truth" on the implication "p->q".
F. N.
--
xyz
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- References:
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- Prev by Date: Re: Linear algebra question
- Next by Date: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|