Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?
- From: Kira Yamato <kirakun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 04:39:44 -0500
On 2006-12-24 03:38:32 -0500, Jannick Asmus <jannick.news@xxxxxx> said:
On 23.12.2006 16:08, Kira Yamato wrote:On 2006-12-23 09:35:54 -0500, Jannick Asmus <jannick.news@xxxxxx> said:
On 23.12.2006 15:21, Kira Yamato wrote:On 2006-12-23 08:58:35 -0500, Jannick Asmus <jannick.news@xxxxxx> said:
On 23.12.2006 13:31, Kira Yamato wrote:Suppose C is a 1-dimensional algebraic set, and F is a proper
algebraic
subset of C. Then, is
C \ F
always affine?
I think I can prove this to be true if C is a rational smooth
curve. In
this case, the field of rational maps of C
K(C) = K(X)
where K(X) is the field of fractions of polynomials in one variable
X. So, suppose
F := { p_1, ..., p_n }.
Then, the coordinate ring of C \ F can be written as
k[X, 1/(X-p_1), ..., 1/(X-p_n)],
which is clearly a finitely-generated k-algebra also. This shows
that C
\ F is affine.
But can this be extended to the general setting to all algebraic
curves
where the curve may not be rational nor smooth?
For a reference I was thinking of, e.g., Hartshorne, Algebraic Geometry,
Exc. III.4.2.
Best wishes,
J.
Hmm... That's gonna take me awhile before I can attempt that exercise.
Chevalley's theorem says that if f: X -> Y is a surjective finite
morphism of separated noetherian schemes then X is affine iff Y is affine.
Let's assume that C is integral w.l.o.g. Then let Y be your original
curve C and C' = X be the normalization of Y in its quotient field. Then
C' is smooth (NB: for integral curves smooth and normal are the same).
By Chevalley, you are reduced to the case that C can be assumed to be
smooth. But you said that you had completed this case already.
J.
Well, I haven't really completed any case that's useful. I only proved it in the simplest case: C is smooth affine rational curve.
In this case, C is isomorphic to A^1. So,
A^1 \ { p_1, ..., p_n }
is isomorphic to the curve with coordinate ring
k[X, 1/((X-p_1)(X-p_2)...(X-p_n))]
which is a k-algebra generated by two elements X and 1((X-p_1)(X-p_2)...(X-p_n)).
This is just the standard way of showing an affine variety minus a hypersurface is always affine.
But thanks for that hint with the Chevalley's theorem. I will look deeper into this.
--
-kira
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?
- From: Jannick Asmus
- Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?
- From: Timothy Murphy
- Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?
- References:
- Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?
- From: Kira Yamato
- Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?
- From: Jannick Asmus
- Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?
- From: Kira Yamato
- Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?
- From: Jannick Asmus
- Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?
- From: Kira Yamato
- Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?
- From: Jannick Asmus
- Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?
- Prev by Date: Re: ZFC's replacement axiom:not 2nd order?
- Next by Date: Re: Rational/Irrational Numbers
- Previous by thread: Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?
- Next by thread: Re: Is an algebraic curve minus a finite number of points always affine?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|