Re: Logarithmic Spirals
- From: "Andrew Usher" <k_over_hbarc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Dec 2006 01:11:51 -0800
Robert Israel wrote:
thus sin (a pi x) b^x would not be algebraic.
But are there any such points?
One thing that can be said, anyway, is that _both coordinates_ are
algebraic exactly if x is rational, which is what I actually proved.
No, you didn't. You didn't say anything about what happens when x is
transcendental.
So what I have shown is
x rational -> both coordinates algebraic
x irrational alg. -> at least one coord. transcendental
x transcendental -> we know nothing
Is this right?
Andrew Usher
.
- References:
- Logarithmic Spirals
- From: Andrew Usher
- Re: Logarithmic Spirals
- From: Andrew Usher
- Re: Logarithmic Spirals
- From: Robert Israel
- Re: Logarithmic Spirals
- From: Andrew Usher
- Re: Logarithmic Spirals
- From: Robert Israel
- Logarithmic Spirals
- Prev by Date: algebra with cyclic and normal.
- Next by Date: Re: Pronunciation of mathematical symbols
- Previous by thread: Re: Logarithmic Spirals
- Next by thread: what does an equals symbol with a delta above it mean?
- Index(es):