Re: JSH: It IS fraud



David C. Ullrich wrote:
On 30 Dec 2006 10:50:05 -0800, jstevh@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

I think many of you think of this as meaningless and inconsequential
where you argue with me and attack mathematical research easily proven
to be correct and you win as long as no one realizes what is going on.

But it is fraud.

Some of you may believe that you are protected by various devices you
use in your own comments or by claiming that you had agreement from
others, but like with my prime counting research, it is obviously
different in crucial ways from what was known before, despite
similarities.

It may seem inconsequential posting here on Usenet, but posts are
public comments so they can be used against you later.

There are a lot of precedents that could be set by this situation, and
it is likely that Usenet itself could face much greater legal scrutiny.

As obviously some of you are using the freedoms given by Usenet in
perpetuating a fraud to block acceptance of easily proven mathematical
results, where it is also easy to prove their value.

Consider a world looking at my equations versus what was there before,
hearing explanations for how they are different and just being able to
SEE they are different as well, as it contemplates punishments for some
of you who may have wanted that money for your retirement versus seeing
it go to someone else because of some stuff you said on Usenet thinking
you'd never be accountable for it.

It IS fraud to make false claims that cause harm to others, and in this
case, making false claims against mathematical research can be shown to
be a harm against humanity itself.

Wow. Since it's harming humanity itself we should be expecting
to be hauled into court by humanity itself, not by you, eh?

Oh. A class-action suit. Ads in magazines: "If you're a member
of humantity you may be entitled to damagesa in the case of..."

Shouldn't it be handled by the World Court in the Hague? Crimes against humanity ...
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: JSH: It IS fraud
    ... But it is fraud. ... it is likely that Usenet itself could face much greater legal scrutiny. ... making false claims against mathematical research can be shown to ... Since it's harming humanity itself we should be expecting ...
    (sci.math)
  • JSH: It IS fraud
    ... But it is fraud. ... it is likely that Usenet itself could face much greater legal scrutiny. ... It IS fraud to make false claims that cause harm to others, ... making false claims against mathematical research can be shown to ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: It IS fraud
    ... But it is fraud. ... it is likely that Usenet itself could face much greater legal scrutiny. ... It IS fraud to make false claims that cause harm to others, ... making false claims against mathematical research can be shown to ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Ultimate check, new way to factor or not?
    ... > I think some of you don't understand the concepts behind Usenet, ... > theory developed to the Number Field Sieve the next. ... discovery as far as I understand it) it *would* have happened faster. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: JSH: It IS fraud
    ... perpetuating a fraud to block acceptance of easily proven mathematical ... All who made false claims against mathematical research, ...
    (sci.math)