Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Virgil <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 13:14:46 -0700
In article <1167492220.138771.111750@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
cbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx schrieb:
Have you given up on your "rational relation" proof that |N| = |R|?
No, why should I? It is correct. (A series with a first but no last
term can be reversed to have a last but no first term - without oosing
its value.)
How does one "sum" a series with no first term? There is no place to
start!
But it is easier to see, and should be visible even for such as you,
that the tree built from the union of all finite trees (with
representations of rational paths) is the same as the complete infinite
tree.
In the union of all finite trees, there are no infinite paths at all,
since to be represented in the union, a path would have to be in one of
the finite trees, ergo a finite path.
In the same way, the union of any family of sets of finite naturals does
not contain anything but finite naturals.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- References:
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: cbrown
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: cbrown
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: cbrown
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: cbrown
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: cbrown
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: cbrown
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- Prev by Date: Hilbert space inequality
- Next by Date: Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|