Re: FLTAA: Field structure p = 2, p>2
- From: "The Dougster" <DGoncz@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 1 Jan 2007 04:29:24 -0800
From
a^n + b^n = c^n in Z we have, BWOC,
x^p + y^p = z^p in Z+ and
(z/y, z/x, x/y)^p = ( 1, 1, -1) in the multiplicative group Mx X My X
Mz.
(z/y, z/x, x/y) ^ 2p = unity in this group.
I recall a theorem from abstract algebra proposing that
Zmn is cyclic and isomorphic to
Zm X Zn if and only if gcd(m.n) = 1.
<(z/y, z/x, x/y)> are cyclic and isomorphic to Z2 X Zp if p>2.
If p = 2, then are these powers cyclic? Surely for x = 3, y= 4, z = 5,
p = 2 these powers are cyclic. What gives? That is, is there a
contradiction?
Doug Goncz
Replikon Research
Seven Corners, VA 22044-0394
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FLTAA: Field structure p = 2, p>2
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: FLTAA: Field structure p = 2, p>2
- From: hagman
- Re: FLTAA: Field structure p = 2, p>2
- From: The Dougster
- Re: FLTAA: Field structure p = 2, p>2
- Prev by Date: Re: base 10 number system
- Next by Date: Re: Interesting Math Books?
- Previous by thread: intimate dating
- Next by thread: Re: FLTAA: Field structure p = 2, p>2
- Index(es):