Re: Irrational numbers questions
- From: Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 15:37:53 +0100
David C. Ullrich wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 12:57:34 +0100, Han de Bruijn
<Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Does it follow now that sum(k=1..N)(1/k) - ln(N) is irrational?
Yes, because a rational plus an irrational is irrational.
Note: this is an approximation of the Euler-Mascheroni constant.
Right! Thus _all_ such approximations to the Euler-Mascheroni constant
gamma = lim(N->oo) sum(k=1..N)(1/k) - ln(N) are irrational. I can not
understand then how it would ever be possible that gamma itself can be
rational. I mean: isn't this already sufficient evidence that gamma is
not rational, hence irrational? Why not? Counter example of some such?
Han de Bruijn
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Irrational numbers questions
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Irrational numbers questions
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Irrational numbers questions
- From: hagman
- Re: Irrational numbers questions
- From: Tonico
- Re: Irrational numbers questions
- From: victor_meldrew_666
- Re: Irrational numbers questions
- References:
- Irrational numbers questions
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Irrational numbers questions
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Irrational numbers questions
- Prev by Date: absolutely continuous
- Next by Date: Re: Hessian Matrix - A stupid question
- Previous by thread: Re: Irrational numbers questions
- Next by thread: Re: Irrational numbers questions
- Index(es):