Re: Extending the reals
- From: cbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 5 Jan 2007 20:09:05 -0800
Ross A. Finlayson wrote:
cbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
For the third time in this thread, "dense", "connected", and
"continuous" have different meanings. And "gapless" has no particular
meaning to me at all; unless it is supposed to mean "dense".
So is it a complete ordered field?
Otherwise there's not the arithmetic on it, defying its stated
properties.
Sets are defined by their elements and N in the generic extension
bijects to R. Transfinite cardinals is finitism.
Or how about this:
Fractal functions form the fjords of finitism.
(Well actually, fractal functions form the fjords of /computability/.
But "computability" doesn't start with "f".)
Cheers - Chas
.
- References:
- Re: Extending the reals
- From: cbrown
- Re: Extending the reals
- From: David R Tribble
- Re: Extending the reals
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Extending the reals
- From: David R Tribble
- Re: Extending the reals
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Extending the reals
- From: cbrown
- Re: Extending the reals
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: Extending the reals
- Prev by Date: Re: Small set Theory:final version.
- Next by Date: Re: The value of pi in the Bible
- Previous by thread: Re: Extending the reals
- Next by thread: Re: Extending the reals
- Index(es):