Re: Set Theory question
- From: aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 6 Jan 2007 07:24:24 -0800
Stephen J. Herschkorn wrote:
thoughtcube@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Let (A, <=) be an ordered (i.e. totally ordered) set. Then there exists
a series a_n of elements of A, for which: for any element a in A, there
is some a_n that is larger than it, i.e. a <= a_n.
The claim is false. No such series exists in omega-1.
Right. But interestingly, if choice fails it's possible that every
cardinal has cofinality omega.
--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx)
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Set Theory question
- From: Jules
- Re: Set Theory question
- References:
- Set Theory question
- From: thoughtcube
- Re: Set Theory question
- From: Stephen J. Herschkorn
- Set Theory question
- Prev by Date: Re: Irrational numbers questions
- Next by Date: Re: Set Theory question
- Previous by thread: Re: Set Theory question
- Next by thread: Re: Set Theory question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|