Re: f and f' square integrable
- From: David C. Ullrich <ullrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:22:35 -0600
On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 17:02:41 GMT, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
<stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
David C. Ullrich wrote:
[...] Only remaining problem is that I really don't feel
I understand _why_ it works - that one-variable fact is just
a meaningless calculation, as far as my current understanding
goes.
I think this paper is relevant:
Krbec, M.; Schmeisser, H.-J.
Limiting imbeddings. The case of missing derivatives.
Ricerche Mat. 45 (1996), no. 2, 423--447.
Heh - whether it's relevant or not it's a colorful title.
************************
David C. Ullrich
.
- References:
- Re: f and f' square integrable
- From: The World Wide Wade
- Re: f and f' square integrable
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: f and f' square integrable
- From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
- Re: f and f' square integrable
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: f and f' square integrable
- From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
- Re: f and f' square integrable
- Prev by Date: Re: Is space continuous ? J. Baez is right.
- Next by Date: Re: Set Theory question
- Previous by thread: Re: f and f' square integrable
- Next by thread: Re: base 10 number system
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|