Re: The case for circumcision

While I don't have enough knowledge of the subject,
the following bothers me:

Andrew Usher wrote:

" Did you read my first post? It isn't _that_ long. There is no reasonable doubt about the benefits of circumcision. That cuts off your argument at the start."

So, do you expect others to agree with _your_ asses-
ment of the evidence?. What grounds do you have to
conclude that anyone else looking at the evidence
would necessarily agree with your assesment?.(other
than your circular statement about how anyone who
is reasonable would agree with you. This is both
circular, and makes your post seem pointless, and
even contradictory: if you state from the beginning
that you believe ciecumcision is beneficial, and
anyone who disagrees with you is unreasonable, why
are you asking for input from others by posting here; you seem to have definitively made up your mind on the
subject?)
Did you actually seek evidence that ran against
the benefits and somehow discarded it, or did you
only look at evidence that favored your case?.
.

Loading