Re: Irrational numbers questions
- From: "Jesse F. Hughes" <jesse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 16:37:35 -0500
Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
Yes, you are right. Therefore it's wise, perhaps, to define it by now.
Definition. Any simplicity of a rational number is zero.
Weren't you the guy that mocked Ullrich when he wrote "rational" and
meant "irrational"?
--
Jesse F. Hughes
"The past two days I haven't had any beer or any wine."
-- Quincy P. Hughes, Age 4 and so damn European
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Irrational numbers questions
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Irrational numbers questions
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Irrational numbers questions
- References:
- Re: Irrational numbers questions
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Irrational numbers questions
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Irrational numbers questions
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Irrational numbers questions
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Irrational numbers questions
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Irrational numbers questions
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Irrational numbers questions
- Prev by Date: isolated eigenvalues and poles
- Next by Date: Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- Previous by thread: Re: Irrational numbers questions
- Next by thread: Re: Irrational numbers questions
- Index(es):