Re: Irrational numbers questions
- From: Han de Bruijn <Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:13:09 +0100
Robert Israel wrote:
In article <1168464314.257076.263370@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<Han.deBruijn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
simplicities are supposed to be useful for reals which are _not known_
yet as to be irrational or not. They are meant as a sort of continuous
transition between rationality and irrationality. I mean, perhaps gamma
is not rational and not irrational and such an in-between number. Or am
I saying something stupid now?
You said it. Irrational means "not rational". There is nothing in-between.
Uhm, how about the Euler-Mascheroni constant?
Is it irrational or rational?
How about the free choice sequences in intuitionistic mathematics?
Han de Bruijn
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Irrational numbers questions
- From: Mike Kelly
- Re: Irrational numbers questions
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Irrational numbers questions
- References:
- Re: Irrational numbers questions
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Irrational numbers questions
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Irrational numbers questions
- From: Robert Israel
- Re: Irrational numbers questions
- From: Han . deBruijn
- Re: Irrational numbers questions
- From: Robert Israel
- Re: Irrational numbers questions
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Next by Date: Re: Irrational numbers questions
- Previous by thread: Re: Irrational numbers questions
- Next by thread: Re: Irrational numbers questions
- Index(es):
Loading