Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: "toshiaki" <farawfu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:37:56 +0900
"Tony Orlow" <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:45a3d6fc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
ooo wrote:..
"Tony Orlow" <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:45a27da4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
toshiaki wrote:
:)
0 e R
x e R -> 2^x e R ^ -(2^x) e R
If you think that size is only relativistic ,I understand your idea .
If not ,I don't know how do you solve the question of scale .
And I f you please , explane about above relation .
I think your idea is simillarity to measure theory .
Regards
Ozaki Tosiaki
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: toshiaki
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- References:
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: Bob Kolker
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: toshiaki
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: Saurav
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: Virgil
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: toshiaki
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- Prev by Date: Re: Galileo's Paradox and the Project of the Reals
- Next by Date: Re: Galileo's Paradox and the Project of the Reals
- Previous by thread: Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- Next by thread: Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- Index(es):
Loading