Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted

Nomen Nescio wrote:
Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
This message will be removed from Groups in 2 days (Jan 19, 1:00
am).

The real frustration for me when dealing with sci.math regulars is the
insistence on lying about the details.

So let me set the record straight on my paper on non-polynomial
factorization, which was the one published and then withdrawn by the
editors after some convincing emails by some sci.math regulars.

If you were reading about all of this as ancient history, you would be
amazed that any sensible people could ever fight against the result,
and be shocked that denial could last for years.

You people have no clue about what's coming as you are not really
mathematicians, so you look around see a possibly unsteady world but
keep thinking that it is rock stable in ways it's not.

Now I came back, after I got over the anger enough to even bother with
the sci.math newsgroup again, and argued with at least one of the
people who falsely attacked my paper to the SWJPAM editors, and
conceded all of his main points, and still showed that my conclusion
held.

It doesn't matter if I don't convince you now, as the fix is coming,
and the answer is that the people who don't get it, are the people who
don't survive, so hey, get it all out now, as soon there will be a lot
of quiet.

But this isn't ancient history--it's right now--and for some of you the
truth means you did not get a valid doctorate, or that argument you
thought was a brilliant proof was not, not brilliant, and not a proof.

My projections indicate that without substantial thinking on the part
of humanity approximately 6 billion people will die within the next 30
years.

If I am correct, on my blog is a rather simple approach that could
solve the factoring problem and lead to a breakdown in current Internet
security.

I am growing more concerned about radical elements within your group
who may get the wrong idea and try to turn things in a way that might
satisfy some of the sicker among you, but which are completely against
rational discourse on any level.

These days will seem like paradise if you survive the next 10 because
with those numbers the odds are that none of you reading this post will
be alive.

It's that close.

I had some recent math ideas that I now don't think lead to anything,
surprise, surprise, not.

Intelligence is more than just a label. Solving problems is more than
just a nifty idea.

This month a few things are going to happen, and maybe then some of you
will get some perspective. But I'm not hoping as my take on it is that
most of you lack even a modicum of the intelligence necessary to grasp
world events on the level that are about to occur.

Oh well, it's not like you have to understand. They will happen
anyway.

Just remember, you may have deluded yourself into thinking that most of
the important stuff was figured out, but later, ask yourself, how could
so many people have been so wrong?

History pivots on the next few decades. Everything that has come
before for humanity is about what will happen in the next thirty or so
years.

Ever hear about how a frog can sit in water that is slowly brought to a
boil versus jumping out, as if you do it slowly enough, it can't sense
what is happening?

It will be too logical if you live in a human-focused world centered
around yourself and your community, where frogs don't just go extinct,
with polar bears, quite a few bird species, horse species and probably
most primate species as well along with so many others, don't forget
plants..so much death.

Obviously part of the logic in a drawn out process is to remove hiding
places for people who later will claim they didn't get a chance, as my
position has been clear for some time--there are too many people
calling themselves mathematicians.

Personally I think there may be a hundred research level mathematicians
possible with the current world population, if that many.

It is my duty to cull out the rest of you.

James Harris

In addition to your usual crankiness, it appears that your behavior
under the psedonym "Nomen Nescio" violates other nettiquette. In
particular, looking under this profile, Google responds with:

"This account has been banned because it violated the Google Groups
Terms Of Use."

.