Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: Andy Smith <Andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 22:13:40 GMT
I
Thank you, understood that, and I can see that things are inevitably more tricky than they might seem. But I don't see that that answers my simplistic argument about gaps between the numbers?
Distinct points on the line cannot have a separation of 0. If a and b
are distinct real numbers, then | a - b | > 0.
However, there is a way to represent the concept of things being "next to
each other" on the line. That is to consider sets of points, rather than
individual points. For example, let
A = { x in Q : x < 0 } (the negative rationals),
B = { x in Q : x > 0 } (the positive rationals).
The sets A and B are distinct, but they approach each other more closely
than any positive real number. In fact, we can say that distance(A,B) =
0, where the distance between sets is defined by
distance(X,Y) = inf{ |x-y| : x in X and y in Y }.
Here, "inf" stands for "infimum", which means the greatest lower bound.
But notice, even though distance(A,B) = 0, there is nevertheless a gap
between the sets. The number 0 lies strictly between A and B and does
not belong to either.
The point is, requiring a distance to be zero is not sufficient to
guarantee the absence of a gap. After all, points have zero width and
therefore they can fit into a gap without causing any actual separation.
This is why the notion of completeness does not rely on distance.
Instead, completeness uses the least upper bound property. The set A
does not have a maximum element, but it does have a least upper bound,
and the LUB is a real number. The same is true of any nonempty set of
reals that is bounded above.
--
Andy Smith
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: Russell
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- References:
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: Bob Kolker
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: toshiaki
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: Saurav
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: Virgil
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: toshiaki
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: toshiaki
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: toshiaki
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: Hero
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: toshiaki
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: Saurav
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: toshiaki
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: Saurav
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: toshiaki
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: Andy Smith
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: Russell
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: David R Tribble
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: Andy Smith
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Next by Date: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Previous by thread: Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- Next by thread: Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|