Re: Is continuum completely filled up?



I

Distinct points on the line cannot have a separation of 0. If a and b
are distinct real numbers, then | a - b | > 0.

However, there is a way to represent the concept of things being "next to
each other" on the line. That is to consider sets of points, rather than
individual points. For example, let

A = { x in Q : x < 0 } (the negative rationals),
B = { x in Q : x > 0 } (the positive rationals).

The sets A and B are distinct, but they approach each other more closely
than any positive real number. In fact, we can say that distance(A,B) =
0, where the distance between sets is defined by

distance(X,Y) = inf{ |x-y| : x in X and y in Y }.

Here, "inf" stands for "infimum", which means the greatest lower bound.

But notice, even though distance(A,B) = 0, there is nevertheless a gap
between the sets. The number 0 lies strictly between A and B and does
not belong to either.

The point is, requiring a distance to be zero is not sufficient to
guarantee the absence of a gap. After all, points have zero width and
therefore they can fit into a gap without causing any actual separation.

This is why the notion of completeness does not rely on distance.
Instead, completeness uses the least upper bound property. The set A
does not have a maximum element, but it does have a least upper bound,
and the LUB is a real number. The same is true of any nonempty set of
reals that is bounded above.

Thank you, understood that, and I can see that things are inevitably more tricky than they might seem. But I don't see that that answers my simplistic argument about gaps between the numbers?
--
Andy Smith
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
    ... requiring a distance to be zero is not sufficient to ... guarantee the absence of a gap. ... reals that is bounded above. ... there are not enough bits to address the reals (and you would still always have as many open intervals as numbers). ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
    ... requiring a distance to be zero is not sufficient to ... guarantee the absence of a gap. ... reals that is bounded above. ... Of course if that was true, then you could still continue the process ad infinitum, but that would mean that there are not enough bits to address the reals (and you would still always have as many open intervals as numbers). ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Non-zero gaps between real numbers
    ... numbers with zero gap between them. ... Let's locate all the reals on the line as points. ... But, by choosing the suitable reals/points, the distance can be ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Non-zero gaps between real numbers
    ... numbers with zero gap between them. ... Let's locate all the reals on the line as points. ... But, by choosing the suitable reals/points, the distance can be ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
    ... it looks like every time you find a "gap" between two ... for any two unlike reals you can ... requiring a distance to be zero is not sufficient to ... completeness uses the least upper bound property. ...
    (sci.math)