Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: David Marcus <DavidMarcus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 21:38:24 -0500
Michael Press wrote:
In article <MPG.201731bcec6d9f73989b5c@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
David Marcus <DavidMarcus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ah, you are at least a hundred years behind the times. No, a function is
most definitely not a formula. A function is a rule which assigns, to
each of certain real numbers, some other real number. For example, the
rule that assigns to each number a the number 0 if a is irrational and
the number 1 if a is rational is a function, but you will have a hard
time coming up with a formula (nor is a formula required).
Hello. I agree. At least one-hundred-fifty years.
Is this a formula?
lim_{m -> oo} lim_{n -> oo} [cos (m! * x * pi)]^{2 * n}
These days or in Euler's day?
Notice I said a "hard time". I didn't say it was impossible.
--
David Marcus
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Michael Press
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- References:
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Andy Smith
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Andy Smith
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Michael Press
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Next by Date: Re: unionizing functions using 0/0
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Index(es):