Re: Small Set Theory,Updated.
- From: "zuhair" <zaljohar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 Jan 2007 08:06:36 -0800
MoeBlee wrote:
zuhair wrote:
x is a set <-> EP(Ay(yex<->(P[y]&~y=x))).
would that be an incoherent statement?
First, is the expression well formed (or at least a rendering of a well
formed formula)? To answer that question, I would need to know the
formation rules of the language. The expression is not a rendering of a
well formed formula in a first order language. But I do know of
formation rules for a second order language that yield that the
expression is a rendering of a well formed formula. But I don't know
whether you intend for the expression to be in such a second order
language.
MoeBlee
Ok, Moe
let me see this then.
take the following statement:
Ay(yex<->(P[y]&~y=x))
I think this is an expression that is a well formed formula in a first
order language. One look to the axiom of separation in ZFC (which is a
well formed formula in first order language) makes me think that the
formula I've wrote above is a first order language formula.
Instead of writing all of this formula which is a long formula, I made
an equivalent formula to it
to short it. and I call it " x is P_defined". so for example instead of
writing
Ex(Ay(yex<->(P[y]&~y=x))), you can write it as Ex(x is P_defined).
That's all. what is vague about that?
I am sure that Ex(x is P_defined) is a first order language well formed
formula. Why not?
so is most of the complex formulae I wrote in this theory.
Zuhair
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Small Set Theory,Updated.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Small Set Theory,Updated.
- From: hagman
- Re: Small Set Theory,Updated.
- References:
- Small Set Theory,Updated.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Small Set Theory,Updated.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Small Set Theory,Updated.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Small Set Theory,Updated.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Small Set Theory,Updated.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Small Set Theory,Updated.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Small Set Theory,Updated.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Small Set Theory,Updated.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Small Set Theory,Updated.
- From: zuhair
- Re: Small Set Theory,Updated.
- From: MoeBlee
- Small Set Theory,Updated.
- Prev by Date: normalizer
- Next by Date: Re: proper+compact
- Previous by thread: Re: Small Set Theory,Updated.
- Next by thread: Re: Small Set Theory,Updated.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|