Re: Cantor Confusion

From: Andy Smith <Andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:13:58 GMT

I never thought you did, and agree that Andy Smith
would have a _very_ hard time.

Poo, no I wouldn't have a problem with suggesting something like that - but I would have a problem demonstrating that it had the required properties on other than an informal level ....

(can you do that?)
--
Andy Smith
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantor Confusion
  - From: Andy Smith

References:
- Re: Cantor Confusion
  - From: David Marcus
- Re: Cantor Confusion
  - From: Andy Smith
- Re: Cantor Confusion
  - From: David Marcus
- Re: Cantor Confusion
  - From: Andy Smith
- Re: Cantor Confusion
  - From: David Marcus
- Re: Cantor Confusion
  - From: Michael Press
- Re: Cantor Confusion
  - From: David Marcus
- Re: Cantor Confusion
  - From: Michael Press

Prev by Date: Re: A help with a formal proof for an "obvious" fact, please
Next by Date: Re: A help with a formal proof for an "obvious" fact, please
Previous by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
Next by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread